Crusher Comparison
Cone Crusher Motion Model
Cone
Crusher Motion Mode
Click on image for larger view |
The diagram to the right shows how the position of
the head pivot affects the crushing process and efficiency.
All known cone and gyratory crushers fit this model.
Early gyratory crushers had their pivot centres located
well below the head while the modern cone crusher has
the pivot center above the top of the head.
Both of these crushers have the common disadvantage
that as the head swishes to the closed side, a gap bigger
than the required “closed” size opens on
the opposite side of the head, allowing “oversize”
to pass through.
Moving the pivot point closer to the head reduced this
at the expense of effective throughput. The Wescone
head design is substantially different. It combines
a central pivot with a two-sided head, eliminating many
of the problems associated with existing models.
As the head swishes to the closed side in the upper
zone, the opposite lower zone closes off, further crushing
the feed and minimizing the escape of the “oversize”
material.
|
Head Arrangement Controls Throughput
Figure
1 - Click on image for larger view
 |
Figure 1
compares the effective throughput of similarly sized
machines, showing that the net throughput will decrease
substantially with movement of the pivot point.
While it might have been previously believed that this
graph was continuous, test with the Wescone have established
a previously undiscovered window of high throughput.
To help understand the problems with existing crusher
designs the associated sketches (figure 2) are provided
to compare similarly proportioned machines, each with
300 gape, 30 stroke (10:1) and 10mm CCS.
|
|
Figure
2 - Click on image for larger view

|
Figure 2
compares the theoretical model with an early gyratory
crusher (with the pivot below the head), a modern cone
crusher (with the pivot above the head) and a Wescone.
In the theoretical case, the small opening prevents
efficient discharge. With the cone and gyratory crusher,
this is circumvented by moving the pivot point out,
at the expense of promoting oversize. The second stage
of the Wescone permits quick exit of crushed products
without oversize.
|
|